Click on image to view the full photo gallery
Volkswagen Vento 1HX0 2.0 (115 Hp) Automatic
Overall Rating
6.5 / 10
1HX0 Overview:
Volkswagen Vento (1HX0). With 170 Nm of torque, it offers ample pulling power. It has moderate fuel consumption (~11.6 l/100km). Weighing only 1235 kg, it’s quite light. Front‑wheel drive delivers efficiency and easy handling. Acceleration is relatively slow (0–100 km/h in 11.9 s). The top speed reaches 194 km/h. A four-door car with a separate trunk, ideal for families and daily commuting. Seating for 4 makes it ideal for daily use.
Safety Rating
Euro NCAP Year
1997
Adult Occupant
12 points (frontal impact)
Stars
2
Expert Note:
The Vento, being based on the Golf III, received a modest 2-star Euro NCAP rating in 1997. This indicates average adult occupant protection for its era, particularly in frontal impact scenarios.
The Vento, being based on the Golf III, received a modest 2-star Euro NCAP rating in 1997. This indicates average adult occupant protection for its era, particularly in frontal impact scenarios.
2.0 (115 Hp) Automatic Verdict:
Performance Verdict
Good power output, but the automatic transmission slightly compromises acceleration and overall responsiveness.
Fuel Economy
Higher fuel consumption than the manual 2.0L, impacting its overall efficiency.
Best Use Case:
Comfortable Cruising / City Driving with More Power
Community Verdict
This rating is based on comments found on Reddit, scanned using artificial intelligence, and may not accurately reflect reality.
Allowed: 60%
Neutral: 0%
Issues: 40%
3.4 / 5
Based on AI analysis of 5 discussions
Read What Owners Say
👍 POSITIVE
The JD power reviews and bullshit and bought out
VW's are reliable. Their 2.0T engines are nearly bullet proof. Granted they have been having issues with their tiguans but overall great cars!
👍 POSITIVE
Yes. I had a 2013 Jetta S, put 160k on it with zero issues and nothing but basic maintenance and traded it in for a new Jetta.
👎 NEGATIVE
A lot of people conflate cost of maintenance with reliability. The people bashing brands like VW, Audi, and BMW will turn around and praise Porsches for being reliable. Yes, Porsches are reliable, but maintenance costs are high.
Being reliable means that the car won't break down on you unexpectedly. Unless you're buying a VW that is well known to fail (for example, 1st and 2nd gen EA888 engines),
👎 NEGATIVE
I’m at 105k miles and had to replace two emissions systems valves ($1800) and the 21’s have shit brakes. I’ve spent more money on brakes and rotors than anything. Almost never have to change them on a Yota or a Honda. Facts
👍 POSITIVE
I've owned 3 beetles (real ones) 3 jettas 2 audis. I try to only buy in the VWAG.
Pros and Cons:
Pros:
- • Robust build quality and durable mechanics
- • Wide range of efficient and powerful engines (especially TDI and VR6)
- • Practical sedan body style with good trunk space
- • Comfortable ride for its class and era
- • Generally reliable and easy to maintain
Cons:
- • Dated interior design by modern standards
- • Entry-level engines can feel underpowered, especially with automatic transmissions
- • Automatic transmissions significantly impact performance and economy
- • Safety rating is average for its time (2-star Euro NCAP)
- • Some parts may be harder to find for older models
Specifications:
Specifications are compared to those of the previous generation(1HX0: 1996 - 1997).
| General: | |
|---|---|
| Brand: | Volkswagen |
| Model: | Vento |
| Generation: | 1HX0 |
| Modification (Engine): | 2.0 (115 Hp) Automatic |
| Start of production: | January, 1992 |
| End of production: | 1998 |
| Powertrain Architecture: | Internal Combustion engine |
| Body type: | Sedan |
| Seats: | 4 |
| Doors: | 4 |
| Engine: | |
|---|---|
| Power: | 115 Hp @ 5200 rpm. Same horsepower |
| Power per litre: | 58 Hp/l [Same length.] |
| Torque: | 170 Nm @ 2400 rpm. |
| Engine Model/Code: | ADY More details about the engine ADY |
| Engine displacement: | 1984 |
| Number of cylinders: | 4 |
| Engine configuration: | Inline |
| Number of valves per cylinder: | 2 |
| Fuel injection system: | Multi-port manifold injection |
| Engine aspiration: | Naturally aspirated engine |
| Valvetrain: | OHC |
| Engine oil capacity: | 3.8 l |
| Engine layout: | Front, Transverse |
| Cylinder Bore: | 82.5 mm mm |
| Piston Stroke: | 92.8 mm mm |
| Compression ratio: | 10:1 |
| Performance: | |
|---|---|
| Fuel Type: | Petrol (Gasoline) |
| Fuel consumption (economy) - urban: | 11.6 l/100 km |
| Fuel consumption (economy) - extra urban: | 6.5 l/100 km |
| Fuel consumption (economy) - combined: | 8.2 l/100 km |
| Acceleration 0 - 100 km/h: | 11.9 sec |
| Acceleration 0 - 62 mph: | 11.9 sec |
| Maximum speed: | 194 km/h |
| Weight-to-power ratio: | 10.7 kg/Hp, 93.1 Hp/tonne |
| Weight-to-torque ratio: | 7.3 kg/Nm, 137.7 Nm/tonne |
| Acceleration 0 - 60 mph: | 11.3 sec |
| Space: | |
|---|---|
| Kerb Weight: | 1235 |
| Max. weight: | 1630 |
| Max load: | 395 |
| Trunk (boot) space - maximum: | 885 l |
| Trunk (boot) space - minimum: | 500 l |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 l |
| Size: | |
|---|---|
| Length: | 4380 mm mm [Same length.] |
| Width: | 1695 mm mm [15mm less] |
| Height: | 1415 mm mm [10mm less] |
| Wheelbase: | 2475 mm mm [Same wheelbase.] |
| Front track: | 1464 mm |
| Rear (Back) track: | 1448 mm |
| Powertrain: | |
|---|---|
| Drivetrain Architecture | The Internal combustion engine (ICE) drives the front wheels of the vehicle. |
| Drive wheel | Front wheel drive |
| Number of gears | 4 |
| Transmission type | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Ventilated discs [Best for performance and cooling.] |
| Rear brakes | Disc |
| Assisting systems | ABS (Anti-lock braking system) |
| Steering type | Steering rack and pinion |
| Power steering | Hydraulic Steering |
| Tires size | 205/50 R15 |
| Wheel rims size | 15 |
| Front suspension | Wishbone |
| Rear suspension | Suspension with traction connecting levers |
Is the Volkswagen Vento worth every penny? Give us your honest ROI.