Click on image to view the full photo gallery
Volkswagen Caravelle T4 2.5 (110 Hp) Syncro
Overall Rating
7.5 / 10
Volkswagen Caravelle:
Volkswagen Caravelle is the nameplate of a van based on the Volkswagen Transporter. For information about the Caravelle, refer to the regular Transporter articles:....(Read more on Wikipedia)
T4 Overview:
Volkswagen Caravelle (T4). With 190 Nm of torque, it offers ample pulling power. With a weight of 1740 kg, it falls in the mid‑range. All‑wheel drive provides excellent grip, ideal for off‑road use. The top speed reaches 159 km/h. A large vehicle designed for transporting goods or groups of people. With seating for 6, it’s perfect for larger families.
Safety Rating
Not rated
Euro NCAP Year
N/A
Adult Occupant
N/A
Stars
N/A
Expert Note:
The Volkswagen Caravelle T4 was produced before Euro NCAP testing began in 1997 and was not officially rated. As an older vehicle, it lacks modern active and passive safety features found in contemporary vans.
The Volkswagen Caravelle T4 was produced before Euro NCAP testing began in 1997 and was not officially rated. As an older vehicle, it lacks modern active and passive safety features found in contemporary vans.
2.5 (110 Hp) Syncro Verdict:
Performance Verdict
The Syncro all-wheel-drive system adds weight, slightly dulling performance compared to the 2WD version. Power is still adequate for most situations, but don't expect brisk acceleration.
Fuel Economy
The added weight and drivetrain losses from the Syncro system mean this is the thirstiest of the 2.5 petrol variants. Fuel economy will be a significant concern.
Best Use Case:
All-weather driving / Light off-road / Towing
Community Verdict
This rating is based on comments found on Reddit, scanned using artificial intelligence, and may not accurately reflect reality.
Allowed: 54%
Neutral: 15%
Issues: 31%
3.5 / 5
Based on AI analysis of 13 discussions
Read What Owners Say
👍 POSITIVE
The JD power reviews and bullshit and bought out
VW's are reliable. Their 2.0T engines are nearly bullet proof. Granted they have been having issues with their tiguans but overall great cars!
👍 POSITIVE
Yes. I had a 2013 Jetta S, put 160k on it with zero issues and nothing but basic maintenance and traded it in for a new Jetta.
👎 NEGATIVE
A lot of people conflate cost of maintenance with reliability. The people bashing brands like VW, Audi, and BMW will turn around and praise Porsches for being reliable. Yes, Porsches are reliable, but maintenance costs are high.
Being reliable means that the car won't break down on you unexpectedly. Unless you're buying a VW that is well known to fail (for example, 1st and 2nd gen EA888 engines),
👎 NEGATIVE
I’m at 105k miles and had to replace two emissions systems valves ($1800) and the 21’s have shit brakes. I’ve spent more money on brakes and rotors than anything. Almost never have to change them on a Yota or a Honda. Facts
👍 POSITIVE
Take care of the car and it'll take care of you for a long while.
👍 POSITIVE
Every 5,000 miles change the oil using the Volkswagen standard 502 synthetic, and you should have many years of hassle-free driving. I'm driving a 25-year-old Passat wagon with 190,000 mi on the clock. So I guess what I'm saying is they're reliable as long as you do the maintenance.
👍 POSITIVE
We have a 22 year old Golf with 200 k, got a new battery and egr valve, a 13 year old polo with a new battery and 75k. And an ID.3 with 20k and 4 years old.
👎 NEGATIVE
Reliable? Yes but not as good as they used to be (built wise). They used to be better but VW cut corners since Diesel gate.
👍 POSITIVE
They are reliable. I only have to top off my coolant reservoir in 4 months.
👎 NEGATIVE
Just had my Tiggy delivery put back for a second time for failing pre-delivery checks. This time, it's airbag warning light on, first was failed rear wiper motor. I'll let you know 'on the road reliability' if I ever get the car out of the workshop.
Pros and Cons:
Pros:
- • Exceptional reliability and durability, especially the diesel engines
- • Highly versatile and spacious interior, ideal for conversions or large families
- • Strong aftermarket support and parts availability
- • Comfortable driving position and good visibility for a van
- • Robust build quality that stands the test of time
Cons:
- • Petrol engines are very thirsty, leading to high running costs
- • Naturally aspirated diesel engines are significantly underpowered
- • Lack of modern safety features due to its age
- • Prone to rust, especially in older, unmaintained examples
- • Can be noisy at highway speeds, particularly the diesel variants
Specifications:
Specifications are compared to those of the previous generation((T4) Long: 1992 - 1995).
| General: | |
|---|---|
| Brand: | Volkswagen |
| Model: | Caravelle |
| Generation: | T4 |
| Modification (Engine): | 2.5 (110 Hp) Syncro |
| Start of production: | 1993 |
| End of production: | 1995 |
| Powertrain Architecture: | Internal Combustion engine |
| Body type: | Van |
| Seats: | 6-9 |
| Doors: | 4-5 |
| Engine: | |
|---|---|
| Power: | 110 Hp @ 4500 rpm. Same horsepower |
| Power per litre: | 44.7 Hp/l [400mm less] |
| Torque: | 190 Nm @ 2200 rpm. |
| Engine Model/Code: | AAF, ACU More details about the engine AAF, ACU |
| Engine displacement: | 2461 |
| Number of cylinders: | 5 |
| Engine configuration: | Inline |
| Number of valves per cylinder: | 2 |
| Fuel injection system: | Multi-port manifold injection |
| Engine aspiration: | Naturally aspirated engine |
| Valvetrain: | SOHC |
| Engine oil capacity: | 5.5 l |
| Coolant: | 11.5 l |
| Engine layout: | Front, Transverse |
| Cylinder Bore: | 81 mm mm |
| Piston Stroke: | 95.5 mm mm |
| Compression ratio: | 8.5:1 |
| Performance: | |
|---|---|
| Fuel Type: | Petrol (Gasoline) |
| Fuel consumption (economy) - urban: | 16 l/100 km |
| Fuel consumption (economy) - extra urban: | 9.3 l/100 km |
| Maximum speed: | 159 km/h |
| Weight-to-power ratio: | 15.8 kg/Hp, 63.2 Hp/tonne |
| Weight-to-torque ratio: | 9.2 kg/Nm, 109.2 Nm/tonne |
| Space: | |
|---|---|
| Kerb Weight: | 1740 |
| Max. weight: | 2540-2700 |
| Max. roof load: | 100 kg |
| Max load: | 800-960 |
| Trunk (boot) space - maximum: | 5400 l |
| Permitted trailer load with brakes (12%): | 2000 kg |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 l |
| Permitted trailer load without brakes: | 700 kg |
| Permitted towbar download: | 100 kg |
| Size: | |
|---|---|
| Length: | 4655 mm mm [400mm less] |
| Width: | 1840 mm mm [Same width.] |
| Height: | 1940 mm mm [Same height.] |
| Wheelbase: | 2920 mm mm [400mm less] |
| Front track: | 1589 mm |
| Rear (Back) track: | 1554 mm |
| Front overhang: | 860 mm |
| Rear overhang: | 875 mm |
| Ride height (ground clearance): | 180 mm |
| Minimum turning circle (turning diameter): | 11.7 m [above average] |
| Powertrain: | |
|---|---|
| Drivetrain Architecture | The Internal combustion engine (ICE) drives the front wheels permanently, and the rear wheels are driven through an electrically or mechanically operated clutch if necessary. |
| Drive wheel | All wheel drive (4x4) |
| Number of gears | 5 |
| Transmission type | Manual |
| Front brakes | Disc [bad for performance and cooling.] |
| Rear brakes | Drum [bad for performance and cooling.] |
| Assisting systems | ABS (Anti-lock braking system) |
| Steering type | Steering rack and pinion |
| Power steering | Hydraulic Steering |
| Tires size | 195/70 R15; 205/65 R15; 215/65 R15 |
| Wheel rims size | 6J x 15; 7J x 15 |
| Front suspension | Independent torsion bar, double wishbone, Transverse stabilizer |
| Rear suspension | Independent coil spring, Trailing arm |
Driven it? Loved it? Hated it? Share your honest review!