Oldsmobile Cutlass Ciera 3.1 V6 (162 Hp)


Overall Rating

7 / 10
Safety N/A / 5
Not Rated
Engine 3.0 / 5
Value 4.0 / 5
Performance 3.0 / 5
Comfort 4.0 / 5
People\'s Opinion 3.1 / 5

Oldsmobile Cutlass:

The Oldsmobile Cutlass was a series of automobiles produced by the General Motors' Oldsmobile division between 1961 and 1999. At its introduction, the Cutlass was Oldsmobile's entry-level model; it began as a unibody compact car, but saw its greatest success as a body-on-frame intermediate. The Cutlass was named after Vought F7U Cutlass, as well as the type of sword, which was common during the Age of Sail.
Introduced as the top trim level in Oldsmobile's compact F-85 Series, the Cutlass evolved into a distinct series of its own, spawning numerous variants. These included the 4-4-2 muscle car in 1964, the upscale Cutlass Supreme in 1966, the high-performance Hurst/Olds in 1968, and the Vista Cruiser station wagon....(Read more on Wikipedia)

Ciera Overview:

Oldsmobile Cutlass (Ciera). With 251 Nm of torque, it offers ample pulling power. With a weight of 1392 kg, it falls in the mid‑range. Front‑wheel drive delivers efficiency and easy handling. A four-door car with a separate trunk, ideal for families and daily commuting. Seating for 5 makes it ideal for daily use.

Safety Rating
Not rated
Euro NCAP Year N/A
Adult Occupant N/A
Stars N/A
Expert Note:
The Oldsmobile Cutlass Ciera was not tested by Euro NCAP, as it was primarily designed for the North American market. Safety standards of the early 1990s were significantly different from modern vehicles, focusing more on basic crash protection and less on advanced driver-assistance systems.

3.1 V6 (162 Hp) Verdict:

Rating 4 stars

Performance Verdict

Offers stronger acceleration and more confident highway cruising, providing a noticeable upgrade in power over the 4-cylinder.

Fuel Economy

Higher fuel consumption compared to the 4-cylinder, typical for a V6 of its time, but acceptable for the added performance.

Best Use Case: Highway cruising, longer trips, and drivers seeking more responsive power.

reddit Community Verdict

This rating is based on comments found on Reddit, scanned using artificial intelligence, and may not accurately reflect reality.

Allowed: 38% Neutral: 31% Issues: 31%
rating
3.1 / 5

Based on AI analysis of 16 discussions

Read What Owners Say
👍 POSITIVE
There’s some good options hiding amongst all the mediocrity. For me it’s between the Impala, the Camaro and (if in SSEi trim) the Bonneville
👍 POSITIVE
Roadmaster wagon, Impala SS and/or a two door Tahoe.
👍 POSITIVE
I’ll take either the Bonneville or the Cutlass.
👎 NEGATIVE
Not at all, imo. Every piece of rubber on that car is going to give up the ghost immediately if you start actually using it. I’ve had much better luck with average mileage old cars than low mileage ones. You’d be better off finding something that has been driven enough to have required maintenance.
😐 NEUTRAL
How much has it been driven lately? Can you read the date codes on the tires? Also consider belts and hoses and fluids? If you're a DIY car person, it could work out.
👎 NEGATIVE
No. Every wire, connection, piece of plastic, hose and tube in that car is 37 years old. That many miles that often, and it will niggle you to death with little failures. Aside from that: it's tinfoil. No ABS, traction control, airbags, etc. Safety wise, it's a motorcycle. Finally, they're just not good cars. I had one for a couple of years and it was both boring and uncomfortable.
👎 NEGATIVE
It's 37 years old, if your ready to pour tons on money into it then yes otherwise I would recommend a corolla or a civic even if they have higher mileage.
👎 NEGATIVE
Every hose, belt, bushing, seal on that car is potentially 36 years old. Reliable? Sorry, nope!
😐 NEUTRAL
Tell him I'll give him the $2700
👎 NEGATIVE
Parts might be hard to find. In my opinion, save up more money and look for something newer, starting in the mid-2000s, where parts are readily available.


Pros and Cons:

Pros:

  • • Comfortable, soft ride quality
  • • Spacious interior for its class
  • • Generally reliable and easy to maintain
  • • Affordable purchase and running costs
  • • Simple, proven mechanicals

Cons:

  • • Outdated interior design and materials
  • • Vague steering and handling
  • • Lower fuel economy on V6 models
  • • Lacks modern safety features
  • • Resale value can be low

Specifications:

Specifications are compared to those of the previous generation(Ciera: 1992 - 1997).

General:
Brand:Oldsmobile
Model:Cutlass
Generation:Ciera
Modification (Engine):3.1 V6 (162 Hp)
Start of production:1997
End of production:1999
Powertrain Architecture:Internal Combustion engine
Body type:Sedan
Seats:5
Doors:4
Engine:
Power:162 Hp @ 5200 rpm.
Power per litre:51.7 Hp/l
Torque:251 Nm @ 4000 rpm.
Engine displacement:3136
Number of cylinders:6
Engine configuration:V-engine
Number of valves per cylinder:2
Fuel injection system:Multi-port manifold injection
Engine aspiration:Naturally aspirated engine
Engine oil capacity:4.3 l
Coolant:13 l
Engine layout:Front, Transverse
Cylinder Bore:89 mm mm
Piston Stroke:84 mm mm
Compression ratio:9.6:1
Performance:
Fuel Type:Petrol (Gasoline)
Fuel consumption (economy) - combined:10.5 l/100 km
Weight-to-power ratio:8.6 kg/Hp, 116.4 Hp/tonne
Weight-to-torque ratio:5.5 kg/Nm, 180.3 Nm/tonne
Space:
Kerb Weight:1392
Trunk (boot) space - minimum:449 l
Fuel tank capacity:63 l
Size:
Length:4892 mm mm [58mm more]
Width:1766 mm mm [Same width.]
Height:1375 mm mm [Same height.]
Wheelbase:2664 mm mm [Same wheelbase.]
Front track:1492 mm
Rear (Back) track:1447 mm
Powertrain:
Drivetrain ArchitectureThe Internal combustion engine (ICE) drives the front wheels of the vehicle.
Drive wheelFront wheel drive
Number of gears4
Transmission typeAutomatic
Front brakesVentilated discs [Best for performance and cooling.]
Rear brakesDrum [bad for performance and cooling.]
Assisting systemsABS (Anti-lock braking system)
Steering typeSteering rack and pinion
Power steeringHydraulic Steering
Tires size185/75 R14
Front suspensionCoil spring
Rear suspensionLeaf spring

Was the Oldsmobile Cutlass what you expected? Let us know!